This is half of a good movie. As long as there's
shooting going on, We Were Soldiers does a good job but as soon
as it explores the life of the wives back home, it gets painfully bad.
We Were Soldiers tells the true story of a Colonel (Mel Gibson)
and the 1st battalion of the 7th Cavalry (The same regiment that Custer
commanded) who fight the first major battle of the Vietnam war. Gibson
is an Omar Bradley not a George Patton. He is the kind of commander
we would all like to have, one who is interested in the welfare of his
soldiers rather than getting the glory. Unfortunately, he is ordered to
take his men into what turns out to be an ambush where they are heavily
outnumbered and cutoff from reinforcements. The three day battle
is intense and draws the viewer into the action as the soldiers seem to
be on their way to the same fate that befell Custer. There is more gore
shown than is really necessary and this film's technological innovation
seems to be slow-motion gore. I closed my eyes many times.
The US Cavalry in Vietnam rode into battle on helicopters, now an every
day experience for troops in Afghanistan, but which at the time, was a
new idea. The helicopter pilots are commanded by a guy nicknamed
Snakeshit (Greg Kinnear). Meanwhile, back home in Georgia,
the wives of the soldiers led by the Colonel's wife (Madeline Stowe) try
to make the best of it. You can compare We Were Soldiers to
The
Green Berets to see how much has and hasn't changed in the last 35
years. The plots of the two movies are very similar. In both, we
see the battle through the eyes of an outsider caught up the action.
Both are reporters covering the war, David Janssen in the earlier movie
and Barry Pepper in We Were Soldiers. In the 1968 mindset
of The Green Berets, there
is an attempt to humanize the good Vietnamese who are fighting with the
Americans (in the person of George Takei, best known for playing Mr. Sulu
on Star Trek). In
the new movie, an attempt is made to portray the attacking Vietcong
as real people. In this, they do a lot better than in Black
Hawk Down where the Somalis were just an evil mob. There is some
subtext, however. While Gibson is on the front line with his men
throughout the battle, the Vietcong commander gives his orders from a bunker
miles away. The battle scenes are very well done and this takes up
most of the movie. But, from time to time, we are whisked back to
Georgia to see the wives dealing with the arrival of telegrams. Time
and space collapse here as the telegrams arrive almost as their husbands
are dying. A similar thing happens during the battle when the soldiers
radio for air support. A plane always arrives to bomb the bad guys
within about 5 seconds. Anyway, the scenes back home are pretty painful
to watch, not because of the what the wives are going through, but because
it's so bad. Madeline Stowe deserves better than this. She
is stuck wearing a wig that Cher
may have worn in 1970, and has to utter some awful dialog while looking
concerned. Greg Kinnear's role is similar, a little reminiscent of
Mikey Rooney's role in The Bridges
at Toko-Ri. But there are so many salutes and longing glances
between Kinnear and Gibson that you have to wonder if they didn't have
a thing for each other. Barry Pepper, a veteran of Saving
Private Ryan, plays a UPI reporter covering the battle and also
gets to have a worried or scared look on his face most of the time.
We
Were Soldiers is a very good role for Mel Gibson and he does a great
job with it, much better than John Wayne in the The
Green Berets. But the film is almost stolen by Sam Elliott who
plays Gibson's Sergeant Major. Elliott makes any film better and
is always a joy to watch. Here, he has been cleaned up and morphed
from his usual slouching, grizzled self into a combat happy Joe.
He gets most of the good lines in the film. There are many other
actors in the film but like Black
Hawk Down, as the battle progresses, everyone gets so dirty and bloody
you can't tell who they are. But you can always see Mel's baby-blues
glinting in the dark. What more do you need?